Riveen Kumanayaka

The Debating Shelf


Introduction to Asian Parliamentary Debating

APD Format is a parliamentary debating model that involves two teams of three members. The Government argues for the motion, and the Opposition argues against the motion. There will be three constructive speeches and two reply speeches.

Speech Length: 07:00 mins (+30 sec Grace)
Reply Length: 04:00 mins (+30 sec Grace)

Prime Minister

The Prime Minister introduces the motion, defines the key terms, and characterises the context of the debate. Sometimes, the Prime Minister would introduce a module if it is a practical or actor motion. They are expected to present the greater portion of the government case, often at least two constructives.

Leader of Opposition

The Leader of Opposition defines any further key terms (if need be), challenges government definitions (if need be), and characterises their context for the debate. The Leader of Opposition may choose to introduce a counter-module if it is a practical or actor motion. They are also expected to present the greater portion of the opposition case. They are not expected to rebut the government case.

Deputy Prime Minister

The Deputy Prime Minister supports the case presented by the Leader of Opposition, extends any left out parts, and presents new constructives. They are not expected to present more than one constructive. However, the Deputy Prime Minister is expected to present rebuttals against the Opposition case. They are often advised to maintain a balance between the amount of constructives and rebuttals in their speeches.

Deputy Leader of Opposition

The Deputy Leader of Opposition supports the case presented by the Prime Minister, extends any left out parts, and presents new constructives. They are also not expected to present more than one constructive but expected to present rebuttals against the government case. They are also advised to maintain a balance between the amount of constructives and rebuttals in their speeches.

Government Whip

The Government Whip carries the main responsibility of analysing common themes and clashpoints within the whole debate. They are expected to share how the government case is more justifes and stands victorious over the Opposition case. They are also not expected to rebut, but may find it useful as part of their clashpoint analysis. The Whip is not allowed to produce new constructives. However, it is possible to shed clarity over and further substantiate existing constructives.

Opposition Whip

The Opposition Whip also carries the main responsibility of analysing common themes and clashpoints within the whole debate. They are expected to share how the Opposition case is more justifes and stands victorious over the government case. They are also not expected to rebut, but may find it useful as part of their clashpoint analysis. The Whip is not allowed to produce new constructives. However, it is possible to shed clarity over and further substantiate existing constructives.

Government & Opposition Replies

Reply speeches do not affect the overall case and reply speakers are not allowed to produce new constructives or rebuttals. This is often compared to a "biased adjudication" due to its relfective role in summarising each case and finalising the debate. Only the first or second speaker of each team are allowed to take this role.