A Debate at the Union Club, Public Domain
Introduction to the Asian Parliamentary Debating Format
APD Format is a parliamentary debating model that involves two teams of three members. The
Government
argues for the motion, and the Opposition argues against the motion. There are three
constructive
speeches and a reply speech for each team.
Preparation Time: 30:00 Minutes
Constructive Speech: 07:00 Minutes & 30 Second Grace
Reply Speech: 04:00 Minutes & 30 Second Grace
Team Line-Up
- Government (Gov): Introduces and
defends the motion
- Opposition (Opp): Introduces the case
against the
motion
Roles Present in the Room
-
Adjudicator [a-juudikater]: An adjudicator moderates and evaluates the debate to produce feedback and a winner at the end. Always be respectful to the adjudicator and it is common courtesy to refer to them as "Honourable Adjudicator" or "Honourable Chair" (when there is only one adjudicator).
-
Timer: The timer is responsible for displaying the speech length of each debater. They may use a bell or an alarm system to indicate the first minute, last minute, and the end. You may request for a stopwatch or a timer based on your preference.
-
Organising Committee Member: Some tournaments may assign members from the OC to observe and assist rooms during a debate. This may involve a dedicated member or a roaming member/s.
-
Debaters: This is you (hopefully). Your job is to debate for the motion you have prepared for and give it your best job. Remember, a debate is just a debate. Doing your best is more than enough. A win is just a bonus.
-
Observers: Observers are non-participating members in a debate. They are typically present only in final rounds or online rounds. However, some in-person tournaments may allow a limited number of observers in preliminary rounds as well. It is important that observers maintain good behaviour and not disrupt the debate or provide any support to the debaters.
Speaker Order & Roles
- Prime Minister (PM): The Prime
Minister introduces the
motion, defines the key terms, and characterises the context of the debate. Sometimes, the Prime
Minister would introduce a module if it is a practical or actor motion. They are expected to
present
the greater portion of the government case, often at least two constructives. Their definitions
hold
for the Closing Benches as well.
- Leader of Opposition (LO): The Leader of
Opposition defines any further key terms (if need
be), challenges government definitions (if need be), and characterises their context for the
debate. The Leader of Opposition may choose to introduce a counter-module if it is a practical
or actor motion. They are also expected to present the greater portion of the opposition case.
However, they are not expected to rebut the government case.
- Deputy Prime Minister (DPM): The
Deputy Prime Minister
supports the case presented by the Prime Minister, extends any left out parts, and presents new
constructives. They are not expected to present more than one constructive. However, the Deputy
Prime Minister is expected to present rebuttals against the Opposition case. They are often
advised
to maintain a balance between the amount of constructives and rebuttals in their speeches.
- Deputy Leader of Opposition (DLO):
The Deputy Leader of
Opposition supports the case presented by the Leader of Opposition extends any left out parts,
and
presents new constructives. They are also not expected to present more than one constructive but
expected to present rebuttals against the government case. They are also advised to maintain a
balance between the amount of constructives and rebuttals in their speeches.
- Government Whip (GW): The Government
Whip carries the main
responsibility of analysing common themes and clash-points within the whole debate. They are
expected
to share how the government case is more justified and stands victorious over the Opposition
case.
They are also not expected to rebut, but may find it useful as part of their clash-point
analysis.
The Whip is not allowed to produce new constructives. However, it is possible to shed clarity
over
and further substantiate existing constructives. They must defend and analyse the cases of both
the
opening and closing benches.
- Opposition Whip (OW): The Opposition
Whip also carries the
main responsibility of analysing common themes and clash-points within the whole debate. They are
expected to share how the Opposition case is more justified and stands victorious over the
government
case. They are also not expected to rebut, but may find it useful as part of their clash-point
analysis. The Whip is not allowed to produce new constructives. However, it is possible to shed
clarity over and further substantiate existing constructives. They must defend and analyse the
cases
of both the opening and closing benches.
How to Win
Government vs. Opposition: Teams will be judged based on the quality of their arguments, completeness of their presentation, resilience against the other team, and quality of rebuttals. Individual contributions will also be factored in when assessing a team's overall score. There must be clear balance between constructives and rebuttals ensuring that the case is both defensive and offensive.
Adjudication Outcome
The winner team is selected and revealed. Some tournaments also recognise a best speaker for every debate. Many adjudicators will provide an extended description and explanation for their decision (known as an Oral Adjudication or OA).